As equity investors face continuing challenges, an elevated bond yield environment has changed the equation.
December 4, 2023
Jim Allworth Investment StrategistRBC Dominion Securities
… pretty much describes the last two years in major global equity markets. After what can only be described as dramatic advances off the pandemic lows of spring 2020 (see table), most indexes peaked some 21 months thereafter and have been doing not much more than digesting those hefty gains ever since.
Source – FactSet; data through 11/20/23
The overwhelming predominance of equity index gains in 2023 has come from the so-called “Magnificent 7” tech and tech-related stocks in the S&P 500 (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Tesla). Indexes which contain none of those stocks (Canada’s TSX, the MSCI Europe, and the UK’s FTSE All-Share) are trading at much lower valuations and have underperformed the S&P 500.
As much as stock indexes have stagnated and gone nowhere over the past couple of years, bond yields have surged higher to levels not seen since prior to the global financial crisis. For the first time in more than 15 years, an investor faced with a maturing bond security in a portfolio does not have to hold their nose and reinvest the proceeds at a much lower and unappealing rate, or hold it even tighter and perhaps shift to high-risk debt or high-yielding stocks to fill the gap in current income.
Today, a combination of government and investment-grade corporate bonds is yielding north of five percent. We believe that makes bonds once again a valuable adjunct to equities in a balanced portfolio, providing, as they have traditionally done, a combination of reduced volatility, more predictable returns, and the comfort of a maturity value.
This new, higher level for fixed income yields has arrived because central banks, led by the U.S. Federal Reserve, have abandoned the massive bond purchase programmes (aka quantitative easing) that were in operation throughout much of the past 15 years. These were designed to push bond yields much lower than market forces would have taken them as a support for the developed economies in the wake of the global financial crisis, the European sovereign debt crisis, and the pandemic.
The line chart shows what a balanced bond portfolio made up of 50% U.S. Treasuries and 50% investment grade corporates would earn on a starting annual yield basis if the funds were invested in those proportions, from 2000 through November 17, 2023. The line starts at around 7% in 2000 then sags progressively in three waves to a low of just 1% in 2021, before rebounding sharply to about 5.3% today. A second line plots the required annual return of the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest pension fund in the U.S. That required pension return was slightly above 8% in 2000 and has drifted very slowly down to about 6.7% today. The bond portfolio’s expected return line is now closer to the required pension return line than at any time in 22 years.
Source – Bloomberg, California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS); data through 11/17/23
First, it reduces the need to buy equities for income in order to make a long-term financial plan work.
At one point in the post-pandemic period, more than 60 percent of the stocks in the S&P 500 sported dividend yields in excess of the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond yield. Rather than make a multiyear commitment to a bond paying an artificially low rate, an investor was able to acquire the shares of a seasoned, probably well-known company with a higher-yielding dividend and offering the prospect that the dividend might be raised periodically.
As a consequence, fueled by the need to boost portfolio income, equity exposure in individual investors’ portfolios crept higher over that stretch when bond yields were deeply supressed by extreme central bank policies. The same trend toward higher equity exposure could be seen in some balanced funds and pension funds.
Today, no such obvious income pick-up advantage is widely available, in our view. Companies possessing dividend yields competitive with or better than bond yields often have other issues attending them.
If individual investors and pension funds find themselves able to achieve their long-term targeted returns and take less risk in the process, many may choose to do so. Lowering equity exposure by a few percentage points and redeploying the funds into fixed income is likely to be a feature of the coming months and quarters.
Second, the need for companies to refinance old loans and take on new ones in this higher-rate world means corporate interest costs are likely to rise, squeezing profit margins if those costs can’t be fully passed on to customers.
Only the largest, most seasoned businesses were able to use the pandemic interlude of ultralow interest rates to issue long-term bonds. Many others had to accept shorter maturities. Some 20 percent of high-yield bonds (i.e., bonds of low-quality issuers) will mature in the next 18 to 36 months and will have to be refinanced at higher rates, which for some will likely be difficult. Even more companies are already being squeezed by the fast-rising cost of floating-rate debt. This latter category includes many small-cap companies, which we think goes some way to explaining their persistent underperformance in the stock market over the past year.
And finally, sharply rising borrowing costs reduce the spendable income of customers – both individuals and businesses. U.S. consumers are contending with higher rates for mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards. At the same time, 44 million Americans are back making monthly payments on student loans.
Meanwhile, the hard versus soft landing debate about the likely course of the U.S. economy carries on. It won’t be settled definitively until the Business Cycle Dating Committee at the National Bureau of Economic Research decides on the official start date of any recession that arrives. That announcement usually comes about a year after the recession has begun – making the proclamation itself not very useful for investors.
For our part, we are persuaded that the combination of high rates and restrictive bank lending standards in place today is a recipe for recession, just as it has been in the past. Soft landings, on the other hand, have historically featured rising interest rates but no overt tightening of lending standards.
And the presence of similar conditions, i.e., high rates and restrictive lending, is already taking a toll in Canada, the UK, and the eurozone. GDP growth in all three has been no more than a shadow of U.S. growth over the first nine months of 2023.
Of course, our expectations for a U.S. recession could be misplaced. The pandemic abruptly ended what had been the longest uninterrupted economic expansion in U.S. history. And policy reactions to that public health crisis kick-started a new economic advance just as quickly. Big, decisive shifts in both fiscal and monetary policy over the past few years continue to have lingering effects on the course of the economy, which could persist in 2024. Instead of an outright multi-quarter decline in GDP, the headwinds alluded to above may do no more than keep growth on the slow side in 2024.
That could be enough to keep S&P 500 earnings growing, although probably not by as much as the current consensus estimate for 2024 ($245 per share, up 11.4 percent from 2023’s expected $220) would suggest. In our opinion, any growth in earnings would leave room for share prices to advance between now and the end of 2024, even if the path for getting there remains in debate.
Stock markets have been rallying recently, after inflation data improved further and the Fed paused its rate hikes, and presumably on the strength of Q3 GDP and earnings growth that was ahead of consensus expectations. It looks to us like the rally could have legs into the new year.
For now, we recommend remaining sufficiently committed to stocks to take advantage of the distinct possibility of some large-cap indexes led by the S&P 500 reaching new all-time highs in the coming few months. However, we believe investors should consider limiting individual stock selections to companies they would be content to own through a recession, which, in our view, is the most probable economic outcome in the coming quarters. For us, that means high-quality businesses with resilient balance sheets, sustainable dividends, and business models that are not intensely sensitive to the economic cycle.
Perhaps the most compelling reason for focusing on resilient, high-quality businesses is that the economic headwinds which have been gathering will, in our view, run their course and probably fully dissipate later in 2024. Equity markets typically have anticipated the start of a new economic expansion several months before it gets underway. In our opinion, portfolios that have held their value to a better-than-average degree will be best-equipped to take advantage of the opportunities that are bound to present themselves when a stronger pace of economic growth reasserts itself.
At some point if a more defensive structuring for a balanced portfolio is called for, having bonds back as a reasonable alternative for an investor looking to take some risk out is a welcome development.
View the full Global Insight 2024 Outlook here
This publication has been issued by Royal Bank of Canada on behalf of certain RBC ® companies that form part of the international network of RBC Wealth Management. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by Royal Bank of Canada, its affiliates or subsidiaries.
The information contained in this report has been compiled by Royal Bank of Canada and/or its affiliates from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgments as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Every province in Canada, state in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.
This material is prepared for general circulation to clients, including clients who are affiliates of Royal Bank of Canada, and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law neither Royal Bank of Canada nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of Royal Bank of Canada.
Clients of United Kingdom companies may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme if any of these entities cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. Most types of investment business are covered for up to a total of £85,000. The Channel Island subsidiary is not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme; the office of Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is a participant in the Jersey Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme. The Scheme offers protection for ‘eligible deposits’ up to £50,000 per individual claimant, subject to certain limitations. The maximum total amount of compensation is capped at £100,000,000 in any 5 year period. Full details of the Scheme and banking groups covered are available on the Government of Jersey’s website www.gov.je/dcs or on request.
We want to talk about your financial future.