With the Suez and Panama Canals operating below capacity, global shipping costs are climbing. We explore the corporate highs and lows from the situation and those that may benefit and those that may lose out.
January 25, 2024
Frédérique Carrier Managing Director, Head of Investment StrategyRBC Europe Limited
Traffic in the Suez Canal, the waterway in Egypt which connects the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, has plummeted. Iran-backed Houthi militants have been attacking commercial ships on this key trade route that connects China with both Europe and the U.S. East Coast. The militants said their attacks are in retaliation for Israel’s war with Hamas in Gaza.
RBC Capital Markets, LLC’s Head of Global Commodity Strategy Helima Croft estimates that around 12 percent of global trade (the equivalent of 10 percent of OPEC oil production) usually transits through the Red Sea, with most of the traffic being en route to or from the Suez Canal.
Data collated by the International Monetary Fund and Oxford University point to a 40 percent drop in daily Suez crossings compared to peak 2023 levels.
As a result of the Houthi attacks, most container ships are being rerouted, with many opting for the alternative route around the Cape of Good Hope at the southern tip of Africa. Eric Lascelles, chief economist at RBC Global Asset Management, said this diversion can add as much as 25 percent more time to trips, swelling the cost of goods being shipped.
In a strange twist of fate, one of the world’s other artificial waterways, the Panama Canal, a key route for goods from Asia heading for the U.S. as it connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, is also struggling – though not for geopolitical reasons.
According to Bloomberg, $270 billion worth of merchandise passes through the Panama Canal annually with 40 percent of all U.S. container traffic travelling through it. Lately, unusually low water levels have limited the number of ships passing through, while a mismanaged expansion of the canal completed in 2016 exacerbates the problem.
As the traffic jam has worsened, authorities have had to limit access to the waterway. Only 22–24 vessels now pass through each day, which is down from 36–38. In some cases, ships are also forced to reduce their cargo size in order to sit higher in the water. It thus takes longer for merchandise to reach the desired destination.
According to Lascelles, the reduced ship throughput is anticipated to remain at just half the normal level through February 2024 at least, with repercussions set to linger well into the year.
As a result of these disruptions, particularly the attacks in the Suez Canal area, spot shipping costs have been on the rise this year. The Drewry World Container Index, a barometer for the spot rate for shipping a 40-foot container on major East-West trade routes, has increased more than 139 percent so far this year, although it is well below the peak rates during the COVID-19 crisis.
Line chart showing the Drewry WCI composite index which represents the U.S. dollar average cost of shipping a 40-foot container on the eight major East-West routes. The cost is up some 139 percent so far this year and is now more than twice the average 2023 level of $1,674. The chart shows the index peaked above US$10,000 at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 and currently stands at $3,964.
Source – RBC Wealth Management, Bloomberg; weekly data through 1/25/24
In reality, few companies will feel the complete impact of the spot rate increase. Shipping costs tend to be long-term contracts which are less volatile than the spot rates. Yet even companies with long term contracts may have to face higher costs in the guise of the cost of diversion as well as foot the bill for higher insurance costs.
On one side of the spectrum, global shipping companies will likely benefit from higher freight rates. Logistics companies and air freight companies may also benefit as some shipping customers choose to transport cargo via air.
On the other side are the companies which may face higher transport costs and/or delivery delays. Some will try to pass the cost increases to consumers through higher prices. But those whose pricing power deteriorated in 2023 may have to absorb these higher costs, eroding margins.
Moreover, shipping delays may result in temporary shortages. For sectors which operate on a “just-in-time” basis, such as auto manufacturing, this can become problematic very quickly as inventory levels for components are kept at a bare minimum. Tesla recently announced a two-week production halt at its German plant as it awaits delivery of components.
In contrast, companies which keep large inventory in warehouses, as many retailers do, may be in a better position to bide their time. If disruptions and shortages persist, however, stockouts may result in lost sales.
With part of the corporate sector reluctant to pass on higher costs to consumers, the direct risk to inflation of higher transport costs may be mitigated. With Europe most affected by the Red Sea attacks, Lascelles calculates that the higher shipping costs could add as much as half a percentage point to inflation in Europe over the coming months if the disturbance persists.
However, we still believe that the key risk to inflation is a further escalation of the Middle East conflict through an increased involvement of Iran. In this case, Croft thinks regional energy supplies could be jeopardised due to Iran having important energy assets. Iran could also, as it has done during previous times of conflict, imperil maritime traffic passing through the Strait of Hormuz, a passageway from the Persian Gulf to the open sea which is critical for global energy supplies. With regional energy supplies compromised, oil prices could surge, feeding inflation.
So far, the recent disruptions in the Suez Canal have had little impact on financial markets overall. Markets seem to believe that Houthi attacks will recede now that the U.S. and UK are sending warships to the Red Sea to protect cargo vessels and the countries are making targeted attacks on Yemen.
Yet the disruption in the two key waterways could eventually result in an increase in inflation and have an impact on global supply chains. Equity markets’ recent resilience as the soft landing and declining inflation narratives gained traction may be put to the test.
This publication has been issued by Royal Bank of Canada on behalf of certain RBC ® companies that form part of the international network of RBC Wealth Management. You should carefully read any risk warnings or regulatory disclosures in this publication or in any other literature accompanying this publication or transmitted to you by Royal Bank of Canada, its affiliates or subsidiaries.
The information contained in this report has been compiled by Royal Bank of Canada and/or its affiliates from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied is made to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report are judgments as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. This report is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Every province in Canada, state in the U.S. and most countries throughout the world have their own laws regulating the types of securities and other investment products which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, any securities discussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act as a securities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in that jurisdiction. Nothing in this report constitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice.
This material is prepared for general circulation to clients, including clients who are affiliates of Royal Bank of Canada, and does not have regard to the particular circumstances or needs of any specific person who may read it. The investments or services contained in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. To the full extent permitted by law neither Royal Bank of Canada nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copied by any means without the prior consent of Royal Bank of Canada.
Clients of United Kingdom companies may be entitled to compensation from the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme if any of these entities cannot meet its obligations. This depends on the type of business and the circumstances of the claim. Most types of investment business are covered for up to a total of £85,000. The Channel Island subsidiary is not covered by the UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme; the office of Royal Bank of Canada (Channel Islands) Limited is a participant in the Jersey Bank Depositors Compensation Scheme. The Scheme offers protection for ‘eligible deposits’ up to £50,000 per individual claimant, subject to certain limitations. The maximum total amount of compensation is capped at £100,000,000 in any 5 year period. Full details of the Scheme and banking groups covered are available on the Government of Jersey’s website www.gov.je/dcs or on request.
We want to talk about your financial future.